
Using customer stories, names and photos in your marketing: the permission Canada requires
The direct answer
In Canada, publishing a customer's testimonial needs their written approval. Section 74.02 of the Competition Act treats publishing a testimonial as reviewable conduct unless the person had already published it themselves, or approved it and gave permission in writing, and the published version must match what they approved. Separately, the federal privacy law, PIPEDA, requires knowledge and consent for collecting, using or disclosing personal information, which covers a customer's name, photo and story used in marketing. Consent is valid only if the person would reasonably understand the nature, purpose and consequences of the use, express consent is generally expected where information is sensitive or the use falls outside what the person would reasonably expect, and consent can be withdrawn. Quebec's privacy regulator describes valid consent as manifest, free, informed and specific to its purpose.

Five conclusions
The argument, compressed.
- A testimonial needs the giver's written permission before it is published, unless they already published it themselves.
- What you publish has to match what they approved.
- Names, photos and stories are personal information; using them in marketing needs informed consent.
- Sensitive details, such as health or finances, call for express consent.
- Consent can be withdrawn, so keep a record and a way to take content down.
Working framework · 4 decisions
The customer story release
Four elements of a one page release that covers both the Competition Act and privacy consent. Have counsel review your template once.
Decision 01 / 04
Exact words
Show the customer the final wording and images, and have them approve that version in writing.
The written permission rule
Section 74.02 of the Competition Act deals with testimonials directly. Publishing a testimonial about a product is reviewable conduct unless the person publishing it can show that the testimonial was previously made or published by the person who gave it, or that it was approved and permission to make or publish it was given in writing by that person. In either case the published testimonial has to accord with what was made or approved.
For most small businesses the practical meaning is simple. A kind email, a message after a project or a comment made in a meeting is unpublished praise, and it needs the customer's written yes before it appears on a website. A public review the customer posted themselves is already published by them, though platform terms and professional rules may still limit reuse.
The simple rule
Unless the customer already published it themselves, get their yes in writing, on the exact wording.
Privacy consent for names, photos and stories
The federal Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act requires the knowledge and consent of the individual for the collection, use or disclosure of their personal information. A customer's name, face and story are personal information, and marketing is a different purpose from delivering the service they bought.
The Act says consent is valid only if it is reasonable to expect the individual would understand the nature, purpose and consequences of what they are agreeing to. Its principles say organizations should generally seek express consent when information is likely to be considered sensitive, and that consent may be withdrawn. The Privacy Commissioner's guidance adds that express consent is generally needed where a use falls outside the individual's reasonable expectations.
Quebec has its own private sector privacy law, and its regulator, the Commission d'accès à l'information, describes valid consent as manifest, free, informed and specific. Alberta and British Columbia also have provincial privacy statutes. A clear written release meets the common thread in all of them.
Customer stories as brand assets
A consented, specific customer story is one of the most valuable things a service brand owns, and the release is what makes it an asset the business can keep using. Stories gathered informally have to come down the moment anyone objects.
Build the ask into the project. The end of a successful engagement is the natural time to request a story, with the draft wording attached for approval. Offer levels of visibility, from full name and photo to an anonymised account, and record what each customer chose.
Regulated professions often face tighter limits on testimonials than this general law sets, which the province specific guides on this site cover. For those practices, anonymised case descriptions and process stories usually do the work a testimonial would.
Before you use it
Questions that can change the recommendation.
Do I need permission to use a customer testimonial in Canada?
Yes, unless the customer already published it themselves. Section 74.02 of the Competition Act requires that the testimonial was approved and permission to publish it was given in writing, and that what you publish matches what was approved.
Can I post a photo of a customer on my business social media?
A customer's image is personal information under PIPEDA, so using it in marketing needs their knowledge and consent, in a form they would reasonably understand. Written consent that names where the photo will appear is the safe practice.
Can a customer withdraw permission for a case study?
PIPEDA's principles allow an individual to withdraw consent, subject to legal or contractual restrictions and reasonable notice. Plan for removal from the channels you control.
Is verbal permission enough to publish a testimonial?
The Competition Act's exception refers to permission given in writing. An email reply approving the exact wording is a simple way to meet it.
Research record
What this guide draws from.
Each source note describes what the reference supports. Platform guidance, research findings and Branding Tatva's practical suggestions have different scopes.
- Competition Act, section 74.02
Justice Laws Website
- Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, section 6.1
Justice Laws Website
- PIPEDA, Schedule 1, principle 4.3 (consent)
Justice Laws Website
- Guidelines for obtaining meaningful consent
Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada
- Consentement: critères de validité (Lignes directrices 2023 1)
Commission d'accès à l'information du Québec
Version 1.0, 31 October 2023.




